Qatar has been branded all over Arabian Peninsula as a country that secretly supports many fundamentalist and terror outfits operating in the region and elsewhere as a matter of state policy to buy peace in exchange of money.
Thus, Qatar has been largely peaceful when other Arab monarchies are facing the heat from rising youth forces demanding for a change and making attempts to overthrow other regimes either by force or religious violence.
The Qatar Royal family and elite military leaders are having discreet ties with more than 40 such outfits or elements having substantial influence among the fundamentalist Muslims spanning across West Asia to North Africa just to ensure the Royal family is safe.
A recent statement by Syria’s Information Minister that Qatar is violating all of the UN Security Council’s resolutions on fighting terrorism is being silenced in the West.
The United States and its allies are keeping silent because Doha is providing funding to carry out their plans.
Nor is there any word about an Arab role in settling the Syrian crisis, because it would be unrealistic for those who are arming one side in the conflict and sending terrorists into Syria to have a hand in resolving it.
And for good reason, if one can recall the recent major terrorist attack in Boston in which there is clear evidence of Saudi brainwashing with Wahhabi ideas.
That is especially true if one looks back in history a little ways-to when leading members of Qatar’s ruling Al Thani family were concealing Saudi terrorists who helped with preparations for the November 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States that killed thousands of civilians.
And if one goes back a few years further, one can find that Qatar was on the US list of state sponsors of terrorism.
It was only taken off the list because it offered to host a US naval base-the largest one in the region-which was used as a command post during the 2003 operation by forces of the United States and its allies to occupy Iraq.
Huge amounts of money from natural gas sales enabled the Qataris get the “leader” of the global anti-terrorist coalition to turn a blind eye on all of Doha’s transgressions in the sacred cause of assisting the “brothers” in sharing the Salafi faith everywhere-from Africa to Kashmir.
If one can trust documents on the WikiLeaks site, in 2008 the former US ambassador to Doha, Joseph LeBaron, cabled the State Department that Qatar was still financing international terrorism.
Leaks of his cables published by the Qatari newspaper Peninsula in 2010 generated an exchange of remarks between LeBaron and its chief editor. But the US ambassador left, and Washington simply hushed the matter up.
In the 1990s, Doha was among the most active “financiers” behind the separatist rebellion in Chechnya.
It sent money to local militants and trained Arab terrorists who participated in attacks on the Russian Army in the North Caucasus.
When the rebellion was put down and peace began returning to Chechnya and the Arab “mujahedin” were almost completely destroyed, Qatar’s Emir provided a refuge for Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev, “president” of the self-proclaimed Republic of Ichkeria and his many supporters, providing them with benefits and even government jobs.
Although Qatar has formally cut all government-level financial ties with terrorist and Islamist groups at the state level, another mechanism for doing that has been put in motion-the so-called Islamic charities of Jamiat Qatar al-Khair, Sheikh Eid al-Khairiah, RAF, and the Qatari Red Crescent Society, which is also involved in allegedly charitable “international activities.”
All are controlled by the Emir’s family or prominent representatives of it, as well as by the Ministry of Endowments and Islamic Affairs. And then there are their non-public activities.
Money is seemingly collected by private individuals. Displays with signs indicating where donations are going can be seen in many of Doha’s large shopping malls: starving children in Somalia, aid for disaster victims in the poor Muslim countries of Asia and Africa, etc.
The geographic scope is broad-stretching from the Western Sahara to the Philippines. As a rule, however, radical Islamist groups are always active in the countries concerned.
And it is never possible to tell how much of the donations made to these funds by private individuals come out of the country’s natural gas revenues.
Officially, members of the Al Thani clan and the Emir himself cannot contribute. They take money from the state treasury-as much as they need, considering that Qatar is an absolute monarchy in which the activities of the Emir are not subject to audit.
And from there, the funds can be transferred to bank accounts in other countries, especially countries where learning the names of the account owners is difficult.
Until recently, active use was made of Swiss banks and offshore financial institutions. It is easy to move funds out of them to specific “aid” recipients and after they are turned into cash they can be delivered by special courier to their final recipient.
That could be a Wahhabi extremist groups in Dagestan or elsewhere in the North Caucasus; Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist cells fighting Syria’s legitimate government; or sleeper cells of extremists in France, the United States and other countries.
Sometimes, the money is simply handed over directly-for example, to Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal when he visits Doha, where he is received as a head of state.
Palestinian sources say that the Emir personally gives him cash that then makes its way to its intended recipients through Arab countries neighboring on the Gaza Strip.
Then homemade rockets that kill innocent civilians are sent flying towards Israel. However, it is obvious that large amounts of money go for other purposes, including undermining the Palestinian National Authority and for the personal “needs” of Hamas leaders.
The Qataris make no bones about the fact that since the Arab Revolutions began they have been directly funding militants and weapons for those fighting the ruling regimes in Arab countries.
They did it in Libya, and they are doing it now in Syria.
And after the recent Arab League summit in Doha, where Qatar’s political weight overcame even Egypt and Algeria to push through a decision allowing weapons to be delivered to Syrian opposition fighters, Doha no longer needs to hide its activities along those lines.
But if one applies the international legal norms to Qatar’s activities, one can find that they actually meet the legal definition of sponsoring international terrorism as spelled out in several UN Security Council resolutions and other international community documents.
Doha’s provision of money and weapons to terrorist groups like Jabhat al-Nusra qualifies as financing international terrorism.